Jump to content


Photo
Rejected

Rep'd for no reason



  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

#1 TheCapeKid

TheCapeKid

    Advanced Member

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:11 PM

http://rc.tf2center.com/lobbies/251476 pl_upward, ~6:00 PM EST

http://logs.tf/529426

 

Reported for "running minis on defense"

 


Posted Image

#2 RickJames

RickJames

    Advanced Member

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:13 PM

More than 5 of our team mates did not want to you use minis it was a serious lobby. We wanted to win. We asked him in mumble to stop spamming coms and take the game more serious. But he just trolled us.


Edited by RickJames, 04 November 2014 - 11:16 PM.

  • Pokemaster73 likes this

#3 Pokemaster73

Pokemaster73

    Newbie

  • Users
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:14 PM

You were throwing pretty much the whole game. I'm surprised you weren't repped earlier.



#4 kyumin2lee

kyumin2lee

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:19 PM

Unless there was a bug preventing you from switching loadouts (which can be the case sometimes), minis for defense; seriously?

 

The stopping power and area denial of a full level three sentry compared to the feeble spam-ability of minis is uncomparable.

 

Although you may be skilled enough to utilise new and different methods from 'meta' loadouts, teammates may not feel the same way, especially when they don't know you properly.

 

Thanks

~TuG


76561198143384608.pngAddFriend.png


b_560_95_1.png


#5 RickJames

RickJames

    Advanced Member

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:23 PM

We had 6-7 players that requested that he should not use minis. They were not helping us at all that's why we were rolled. Also he was repped out witch means that 4 teammates disagreed with capes actions. Also there was no bug preventing cape from switching loadouts he even was using level 3's on offence witch failed.



#6 TheCapeKid

TheCapeKid

    Advanced Member

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:26 PM

I just wanted to note that I was neither trolling nor spamming mumble comms.

 

And yes TuG, I am aware of how different sentries work. I just don't think this eschewing meta is a reppable offense.

 

Also, we were getting pretty rolled, regardless of my own individual actions.


Posted Image

#7 RickJames

RickJames

    Advanced Member

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:30 PM

Also cape was 4-21 in this lobby because you were spamming coms and trolling this game hard. I feel you reported us to forms just to maybe troll. 



#8 kyumin2lee

kyumin2lee

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:34 PM

I just wanted to note that I was neither trolling nor spamming mumble comms.

 

And yes TuG, I am aware of how different sentries work. I just don't think this eschewing meta is a reppable offense.

 

Also, we were getting pretty rolled, regardless of my own individual actions.

Believe me, it is. The engineer is the backbone of the team, and you denying your team of full sentries is like the demo denying the team of stickies when they need them or medic running vaccinator in the push. It's annoying and unhelpful. I would rep our engi if he was running minis on defense without much reason.

 

Also cape was 4-21 in this lobby because you were spamming coms and trolling this game hard. I feel you reported us to forms just to maybe troll. 

Well meh without mumble recordings this is hard to prove.


76561198143384608.pngAddFriend.png


b_560_95_1.png


#9 VoidWhisperer

VoidWhisperer

    Void

  • Users
  • PipPipPip
  • 683 posts

Steam Profile

Posted 04 November 2014 - 11:34 PM

Given that he was running minis on defense, i'm going to deny this. Also, please keep in mind that these ban threads ARE NOT DISCUSSION THREADS.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Rejected