I'd also like to say that after joining an iron team's roster, my rating has dropped from 4 stars to 2 on Heavy (the only class I play on tf2c). So one can perform great on one class (at least, I like to think I perform decently in most lobbies) but if they're in a low ranked team's roster they shouldn't have a high rating? It denies the efforts one goes through to better themselves. Lobbies are the only thing I can play due to my relatively bad location to the rest of the world, and I've learned a lot from them (also from watching povs and the likes of those), and I don't feel like my ratings deserve to go down the drain because of a team I'm in. Identically, I don't feel like someone who's in a high ranked team deserves high ratings on classes they don't even play often-- some people have 3 to 4 stars on classes they rarely play just because of their roster placement.
I'm not going to tell you how to do your job, as I couldn't begin to imagine how much effort you pour in your work as tf2c devs. However, I ask of you the following:
• Either rework the stars system so that it penalizes people less based on their roster, and rewards them more for their performance
• Or change the purpose of the stars rating. I know a lot of people who are very good in terms of DM and gamesense, yet their ratings are low because of their roster.
Thank you for reading. I hope the stars rating can be changed before ALs are re-integrated into the website.
Edited by Cortana, 23 July 2015 - 12:09 PM.